STANDARD RESPONSE IGNORING WHAT I SAID

This is the response I got back from my MP which completely ignored what I said about how the persistent trails opposed to the science of normal contrail formation are definitely NOT "normal contrails"...

---------------------------------

I write in response to your e-mail of the 13 October regarding trails from aircraft. I have been contacted by another constituent about this matter and made enquiries with my colleagues in the Department for Food Environment and Rural Affairs.

A common conspiracy theory claims that these trails are actually "chemicals or biological agents sprayed at high altitudes for a purpose undisclosed to the general public".

DEFRA confirm that such a theory has absolutely no basis in fact whatsoever and, as such, is not scientifically recognised.

Condensation trails, however, are often emitted by high flying aircraft. These are commonly known as contrails and are composed very simply of ice crystals and water vapour caused by the combustion process.

I hope you find this information helpful.

Regards and best wishes

--------------------------------------------------

No basis in fact whatsoever???!??!? What I wrote about how the government has ADMITTED to "chemicals or biological agents sprayed at high altitudes for a purpose undisclosed to the general public" has also clearly been completely ignored. I WOULD CALL THAT A FACT! Here is the Guardian article detailing how Liberal Democrat MP Norman Baker has managed to get the information about it released, and also how the spraying is NONE OF THE PUBLIC'S BUSINESS...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2002/apr/21/uk.medicalscience

Clearly the letter I received contradicts this information, conveniently ignoring actual facts, and assuring me that everything is OK and there is NO SUCH THING as the government has already admitted to!